Applied Quantum Computing Case Study — Public Policy & Machine Learning
Public Policy & ML- Hybrid VQE Accelerates NP‑Hard Redistricting Optimisation
1 | Civic Tech Brief
A non‑profit must propose congressional redistricting maps that satisfy contiguity, equal‑population, and partisan‑fairness constraints—an NP‑hard combinatorial search. Classical simulated annealing (GPU) takes hours per state at 1 K map iterations.
2 | Solution Outline
Use Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) on QPU to find lower‑energy (fairer) district boundary sets; GPU handles constraint scoring, QPU solves Hamiltonian minimisation.
3 | Workflow
🧠 Key Components:
GPU handles:
Building adjacency matrix (county graph)
Encoding fairness/contiguity constraints into Hamiltonian
Scoring (energy), gradient (∇E) via SPSA optimizer
QPU (e.g. Rigetti Aspen-M) runs VQE circuits to evaluate energy for given θ (parameter vector)
Sidecar (gRPC service) handles communication between classical and quantum layers
⚖️ Optimization Objective:
Minimize a Hamiltonian:
H = α·(population variance) + β·(partisan bias) + γ·(boundary cuts)
Subject to: contiguity, equal-pop, compactness.
4 | Quil Sample
Code repository for doing hands on exercise Indicative Project Source code
HAMILTONIAN = """
# qubit indexed counties
# H = Σ w_ij Zi Zj + Σ b_i Zi
"""
from pyquil import Program, get_qc
from openfermion.utils import qubit_operator_sparse
prog = Program() # Add parameterised RX,RZ gates ...
qc = get_qc("Aspen-M-2")
result = qc.compile_and_run(prog, shots=1000)
5 | Kubernetes Considerations
1. Add PriorityClass for qpu-gateway
(score 100000) so it preempts non‑critical pods if node pressure.
2. Gateway taint toleration for CPU‑only nodes.
6 | Outcomes
1. Average objective energy 7 % lower than best classical anneal after 15 min compute budget.
2. Generated 25 candidate maps per state (Ohio, Georgia) vs. 8 previously, giving policy analysts richer option space.
7 | Ethical Notice
1. All data open‑sourced; algorithmic choices published for transparency.
2. Quantum layer did not bias fairness metric; rather improved search coverage.